The Hinalayan Times

पौष २०७७

New directives to control online media worry free speech proponents

Minister of Communications and Information Technology Parbat Gurung’s announcement that the government will bring new directives to prevent online media and social networking sites from spreading hateful message has worried proponents of free speech.

पूर्ण विवरण

सम्बन्धित सामग्री

Australia issues warning to Twitter over online hate

June 22: Australia's cyber regulator has called on Twitter, which is owned by multi-billionaire Elon Musk, to explain its handling of online hate. The country's online safety commissioner says Twitter has become the most complained-about platform.

Ratopati English जेष्ठ २०८०

Why is Elon Musk spending his time on Twitter, not on the mission to Mars?

DEC 17: He is one of the world's richest men - sometimes the richest, depending on the price of Tesla shares, his main financial asset. With a string of other high-profile companies under his wing, including Tesla, Space X, Starlink, and Neuralink, he is also a subject of global fascination. Then, of course, there is his own personal story - the tall, 51-year-old billionaire with 10 children ranging in age from one to 18. His first son died aged just 10 weeks. Musk, who was born in South Africa, has described living with Asperger's syndrome, a type of autism, and stated that his main goal in life is to colonise Mars. What I have learned is - as, perhaps, with many of us - there are many different faces of Elon Musk. The persona he projects via his prolific tweets is provocative, controversial and bombastic. He loves a rude meme, knows whatever he says will make headlines around the world, and enjoys trolling the media with ever more outlandish statements and jokes. He likes trying to goad us journalists into writing ever more extreme headlines. In public, he has learned to be a showman, whether dancing alongside electric-car-making robots, emerging triumphantly from the latest slick Tesla prototype, or being filmed walking into Twitter's headquarters carrying a sink - "Let that sink in" was the gag, playing off a popular meme on the site. This Halloween, he attended a party in leather armour, a $7,500 costume called "the devil's champion". And yet Tallulah Riley, his ex-wife, whom he married twice, described him in BBC documentary series The Elon Musk Show as "sweet" and "shy". Veteran Silicon Valley journalist and author Mike Malone, who has known Mr Musk for 20 years, tells me he sees "a very reserved, very smart, very introspective and intellectual guy" who spends long transatlantic flights with him reading complex trajectory tables, trying to work out how to land a spacecraft on Mars. The pair have a long-standing $5 (£4) bet over Mr Musk's ambition to send people to Mars by 2030. "I said, 'I don't think you can do it - but I hope you do. I hope I owe you the $5,'" Mr Malone says. "That bet's still floating in the air". Sending people to Mars is a lifelong goal for Mr Musk. Some say it is his take on long-termism - a philosophy favoured by some very rich people which seeks to act in the interests of billions of people in the far future, rather than focusing on the immediate needs of the present. At some point, the human race is going to have to leave Earth, he says. And his interest in space is clearly signposted in his existing business portfolio. But where, on Earth, does Twitter fit in? Mr Musk answered that question, this week - in a tweet. "Social media in general, especially Twitter, were eroding civilisation," he wrote. "If civilisation collapses before Mars becomes self-sustaining, then nothing else matters. Human consciousness is gone." But how was Twitter "eroding civilisation"? Mr Musk said, at the very beginning, his aim in buying the platform was to create a 21st Century digital, global town square for discussing society's big issues. He has written many times about perceived imbalance under the previous regime, arguing that right-leaning views were given less visibility by Twitter staff than left-leaning ones, skewing debate and creating echo chambers where nobody saw material that challenged their existing viewpoint. With some handpicked journalists, he published the "Twitter files", a selected set of internal documents, to support his view. The amount of abuse and misinformation thrown around on the platform could also be seen as distracting from the real issues Mr Musk wants discussed. But as anyone who has ever tried will know, navigating that tightrope between allowing free speech and suppressing hateful content is very, very hard. Maybe there is a connection somewhere in Mr Musk's mind between Twitter and Neuralink, which is trying to create a direct link between human brains and computers. Could it be that Twitter forms part of his research and he has essentially bought himself a living, breathing neural network of 300 million people sharing their lives, and opinions, in real time, online? OK, we are in the realms of science fiction. But transporting that to another planet in some form would be one way of taking human consciousness away from Earth - and we know Mr Musk likes a challenge. Different challenge Mr Malone may never see his $5 - and betting against Mr Musk is generally a bad idea, entrepreneur Dolly Singh, who worked with him for six years at SpaceX, until 2013, says. "I would, by rule, never bet against him," she says. "Anything that's a machine - hands down, he's going to win." But Ms Singh also thinks Twitter presents her former boss with a different challenge. "This is going to be harder than he has anticipated - and it's going to be a lot of work for him," she says. Messy network Mr Musk has talked openly about preferring engineering and code to people. Growing up, he did not understand people did not necessarily say what they meant, he told a Technology, Entertainment, Design (Ted) conference in Vancouver, last year. In a text message, released as part of court papers for a legal case against Twitter that never actually happened, he wrote: "I interface way better with engineers who are able to do hardcore programming than with program managers/MBA [Master of Business Administration] types of people and/or frankly I hate doing mgmt [management] stuff. I kinda don't think anyone should be the boss of anyone. But I love helping solve technical/product design problems." His problem is that Twitter is one huge messy network of millions of people shouting, laughing, teasing, trolling, arguing - loud, complex and nuanced. Mr Musk has already struggled with trying to moderate it, even with a promise of a lighter touch than the previous regime. And Ms Singh is not the only observer to ask whether he will find it more difficult to run smoothly than he imagined. 'Hard worker' As a businessman and a leader, he can be brutal - although arguably no more so than other chief executives. Within one week of buying Twitter, he had laid off half the workforce. Those remaining were asked to sign contracts committing to an "intense" work ethic and long hours. Pre-Twitter, he was one of the first to call for the staff of all his companies to be back at the workplace full time following pandemic lockdowns. And he will not tolerate less than 100% commitment from his employees. Ms Singh describes the Musk she knew as an "incredible leader", determined to "prove everybody wrong" when told he cannot achieve something, and, as is often said about him, a phenomenally hard worker. "Elon wants to live in a world where he works 80 hours a week," she says. "It's OK for him to say, 'I expect you to work as hard as me,' because he's not phoning it in from the beach, he's sleeping in a sleeping bag on the factory floor." Most people, she says, burn out after a while. He does not. He has installed beds in Twitter's San Francisco headquarters, seemingly for his staff - although, he is understood to be sleeping there himself. He even shared a picture of his two-year-old son, X, wearing a company pass. Others who worked with him in the 1990s also recall his extraordinary work ethic. He was furious, one said, to find nobody in the office at 21:00 on a Friday night. Ms Singh says his time is Mr Musk's most precious commodity. "Think about what it's worth, per second," she says. You do not need to do the maths to know it is eye-watering. And right now, he is pouring it all into Twitter. Perhaps Mr Malone should not spend his $5 just yet. (with inputs from bbc)

Ratopati English मंसिर २०७९

Depp-Heard trial: Why Johnny Depp lost in the UK but won in the US

JUNE 3: At the start of his recent trial, many legal experts suggested that Mr Depp had a weaker chance of winning than he did in the UK, because the US has very strong free speech protections. The fact that the jury found that Ms Heard was guilty of defamation with an article in which she claimed she was a victim of domestic abuse means they didn't believe her testimony. Mark Stephens, an international media lawyer, told the BBC that it's "very rare" that essentially the same case is tried on two sides of the pond and gets different results. He believes the main factor that influenced Mr Depp's victory in America was the fact that his US trial was before a jury while his UK trial, over an article in the British tabloid that called him a "wife-beater", was before a judge only. "Amber Heard has comprehensively lost in the court of public opinion, and in front of the jury," he said. In both the UK and the US trial, Mr Depp's lawyers argued that Ms Heard was lying - to make their case, they attacked her character and claimed that she was in fact the abusive partner. This is a common defence tactic in sexual assault and domestic violence trials called "deny, attack, and reverse victim and offender" or "Darvo", said Mr Stephens. The strategy turns the tables on the alleged victim, shifting the conversation away from "did the accused commit abuse" to "is the alleged victim believable". "They deny that they did anything, they deny they're the real perpetrator, and they attack the credibility of the individual calling out the abuse, and then reverse the roles of the victim and the offender," Mr Stephens said. In the UK trial, Mr Stephens said the judge recognised that strategy, and dismissed a lot of the evidence that did not directly address whether Mr Depp committed assault or not. "Lawyers and judges tend not to fall for it, but it's very, very effective against juries," he said. Men are more likely to believe Darvo arguments, but female jurors are also susceptible. "People have a paradigm in their mind of how a victim of abuse might be like and how they might behave, and of course we all know that's often false." Hadley Freeman, a Guardian journalist who covered both cases, told the BBC that another major difference was the fact that the American trial was televised, turning the court case into "almost a sports game". Each twist and turn of the trial was watched by millions of people - many of whom turned to social media to express support for Mr Depp. On TikTok, the hashtag #justiceforjohnnydepp got about 19 billion views. The jury was instructed not to read about the case online, but they were not sequestered and they were allowed to keep their phones. Ms Freeman also thinks that vitriol that the general public lobbed against Ms Heard was a "a bit of #MeToo backlash". "'Believe women' seems a very long time ago when it comes to Amber Heard," she said. With inputs from BBC

Ratopati English बैशाख २०७९

Why IT Bill is flawed

Arresting for writing in social media platforms, forcing artists to delete their songs from the internet and filing court cases against comedians are some of the missiles launched by the authorities to curtail free speech in recent times. These trends suggest that the government authorities are determined to curtail freedom of expression in online and offline platforms. With the promulgation of regressive and restrictive laws one after another, the situation is getting worse.

Republica मंसिर २०७६