Supreme Court denies interim order on House dissolution case, asks govt to furnish written response

KATHMANDU, June 9: Hearing on the writ petitions registered against the dissolution of the House of Representatives (HoR), the Constitutional Bench headed by Chief Justice Cholendra Shumsher JBR has refused to issue an interim order as demanded by the petitioners.  The reconstituted bench, on Wednesday, asked the defendants including Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli, the Office of President and the Office of Prime Minister and Council of Ministers (OPMCM) to submit a written response by June 22.  The bench will continue hearing the petition once it receives response from the defendants, according to Chief Justice Rana.  Asx many as 26 writ petitions have been filed at the apex court demanding it reinstate the 275-member lower house of parliament, while four other petitions have asked the court to issue an order to appoint KP Sharma Oli as the prime minister as per the Article 75 (5) of the Constitution of Nepal.  Legal practitioners including senior advocate Shambhu Thapa pleaded from the petitioner's side on Wednesday.  It is to be noted that President Bidya Devi Bhandari, at the recommendation of KP Oli-led Cabinet, dissolved the House on May 22. It is the second time in five months that the lower house got dissolved. Earlier, the Supreme Court’s Constitutional Bench had restored the House, which was dissolved on December 20, 2020, on March 7.  

सम्बन्धित सामग्री

Hearing on House dissolution case concludes, verdict on July 12

KATHMANDU, July 5: The ongoing hearing on the House dissolution case at the Supreme Court (SC) has been over.  The hearing which resumed on June 23 and continued without an interruption finally concluded on the 11th day on Monday.  The Constitutional bench presided by Chief Justice Cholendra Shumsher JB Rana will continue on July 12. CJ Rana shared that the verdict will be pronounced on the same day.  The bench comprises justices Dipak Kumar Karki, Mira Khadka, Ishwar Prasad Khatiwada and Dr Ananda Mohan Bhattarai along with CJ Rana.  Amicus curiae presented their opinion over the case following the reply debate by the legal practitioners of the writ petitioners including Nepali Congress President Sher Bahadur Deuba and 145 other members of the dissolved House.  Senior advocates Harihar Dahal, Badri Bahadur Karki, Krishna Prasad Bhandari and Shambhu Thapa replied on behalf of the plaintiffs on Monday.  The amicus curiae comprises four members --- Komal Prakash Ghimire, Prakash Bahadur KC, Raghav Lal Baidhya and Usha Malla Pathak. They were allotted a couple of hours.  Plaintiffs and defendants were allocated 15 hours each to prsent their arguments on the case. The 275-member House of Representatives (HoR) was dissolved on May 22.

House dissolution debate: Verdict likely next week

The Supreme Court is likely to hand down its final verdict on the debate related to the dissolution of the House of Representatives by the end of the next week.

House dissolution debate: Govt side begins its arguments

As the Supreme Court is continuing the hearing over Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli's decision of dissolving the House of Representatives, the government has begun presenting its arguments on Monday.

Supreme Court to continue hearing of House dissolution case from June 23

The Supreme Court has halted the hearing of the petitions filed against the dissolution of the House of Representatives continuously from June 23.

(Updated) Supreme Court to resume House dissolution hearing on Sunday

The Supreme Court is likely to halt the hearing of the writ petitions filed against Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli's decision to dissolve the House of Representatives for around one week.

"House dissolution was followed by procedural error"

KATHMANDU, May 28: Hearing over the writ petitions registered at the Supreme Court (SC) against the ‘unconstitutional’ dissolution of the House of Representatives is underway at the Chief Justice Cholendra Shumsher JBR-led five-member Constitutional Bench on Friday afternoon.  Chief Justice Cholendra Shumsher JBR formed a five-member Constitutional Bench under his leadership. The other four members of the Constitutional Bench include the justices Dipak Kumar Karki, Dr Aanand Mohan Bhattarai, Tej Bahadur KC and Bam Kumar Shrestha.  Petitioners and legal eagles, while pleading over the case, argued that the recent dissolution of the House had procedural error. Pleading against the dissolution, advocate Santosh Bhandari demanded the apex court reinstate the HoR as it was dissolved without completing the constitutional procedure of new government formation.  Another advocate, Sujan Nepal said that the prime minister elected as per Article 76 (3) can not skip Article 76 (4) and move on to Clause 5. “Article 76 (5) can be implemented only if the prime minister resigns or loses trust vote in parliament as per Clause 5,” he argued. Another petitioner, advocate Shailendra Prasad Ambedkar said that the prime minister, who has yet to win a vote from parliament, can not dissolve the House.  Similarly, Mohana Ansari and  Raj Kumar Suwal also pleaded against the House dissolution.  Of the 30 petitions registered at the Supreme Court (SC), 19 were heard at a single-bench led by Chief Justice Cholendra Shumsher JBR on Thursday. All of them have also been forwarded to the Constitutional Bench. Writ petitioners have demanded the SC issue an interim order to restore parliament. Friday’s bench will decide whether or not to issue the interim order as sought by the petitioners.  President Bidya Devi Bhandari, upon the recommendation of the Council of Ministers, dissolved parliament on May 22 as per Article 76 (7) of the Constitution of Nepal.

Supreme Court to hear all petitions on House dissolution in constitutional bench

The Supreme Court has decided to hear all writ petitions filed against the government's decision to dissolve the House of Representatives in the five-member constitutional bench headed by Chief Justice Cholendra Shamser Rana.

When will hearing on writ petitions against House dissolution kick off?

24 writ petitions registered at Supreme Court against House dissolution, 4 others in favor of PM Oli  KATHMANDU, May 25: As many as 24 writ petitions have been registered at the Supreme Court (SC) against the ‘unconstitutional’ dissolution of the House of Representatives (HoR).  Following the House dissolution on May 22 by President Bidya Devi Bhandari at the recommendation of the Council of Ministers, 146 outgoing lawmakers belonging to the opposition alliance reached the apex court in-person on Monday and registered a writ petition demanding House restoration and appointment of Nepali Congress (NC) President Sher Bahadur Deuba. The petitioners claimed that the PM KP Oli-led government does not have a legitimacy to remain in power as the president had already called the MPs for new government formation.  According to the Supreme Court administration, as many as 28 writ petitions were filed at the court as of Monday including 24 against the House dissolution move. Four other petitions, however, were registered in favor of Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli.  While nine of the 28 writ petitions will be forwarded to the Constitutional Bench, 19 others will be settled through the general bench.  When will hearing begin? According to the SC administration, all the petitions will be entered into the computer record on Tuesday. There is public holiday on  Wednesday on the occasion of Buddha Jayanti. Hearing at the Constitution Bench does not take place on Thursday. Therefore, hearing on the nine writ petitions including the one by 146 lawmakers is likely to begin  on Friday.  Hearing at the general bench over the 19 writ petitions will begin Thursday onwards, according to a source at the SC.  President Bidya Devi Bhandari dissolved parliament at the recommendation of the Council of Ministers, as per the Article 76 (7) of the Constitution of Nepal. Earlier, Congress President Sher Bahadur Deuba laid a claim for a new government with the support of 149 lawmakers as  the President had called upon the members of the lower house of parliament to stake their claim for the new government formation as per Article 76 (5). Prime Minister KP Sharma Oli, who had opted not to take a trust vote in parliament as per Article 76 (4), also staked a claim for a new government. President Bhandari, however, rejected both the claims.

Opposition parties to file lawsuits against House dissolution on Monday

Opposition parties have decided to file lawsuits at the Supreme Court against the government's dissolution of the House of Representatives on Monday.

BREAKING: Supreme Court to pass verdict on House dissolution case shortly

KATHMANDU, Feb 23: The Supreme Court is delivering its verdict on the House dissolution case shortly.